Procurement & Supply Chain Practice

A Fractional Head of Procurement, with a team behind them

Category strategy, supplier negotiation and sourcing governance. Named for what this market actually calls the role — not force-fitted into a "Chief Procurement Officer" label the fractional world doesn't really use.

Why this isn't badged "Fractional CPO"

"CPO" means Chief Product Officer everywhere the fractional-executive market prices and markets itself. Procurement leadership at this level doesn't sell through that channel at all — it sells through the interim-director market, at interim-director rates. So we've named and positioned this seat the way the market actually works, not the way a tidy six-box seat list would prefer.

What you get is the same regardless of the label: a senior operator who owns category strategy, supplier negotiation and sourcing governance at board level — with our delivery bench behind them to actually run the sourcing sprints the strategy calls for.

Colleagues reviewing reports and contract terms around a meeting table
4 weeksto a signed ERP contract, using an agile sourcing sprint — real, independently reported case data
45 daysto a competitively bid public-sector award — against a typical multi-month cycle
9%→15%savings target delivered at nearly double the original goal in a published case study
2practice areas this seat draws on directly — Procurement & Supply Chain, and Business & Operating Model

If more than two of these are true, spend is already leaking

Nobody at board level owns category spend as a strategic lever, only as a cost line to be trimmed.

Supplier concentration risk has never been formally reviewed — you'd struggle to answer "what happens if they fail?"

Contracts auto-renew because renegotiating them takes longer than anyone has time for.

Sourcing cycles take months when a structured sprint could realistically take weeks.

AI and software vendor contracts are signed without commercial or risk review.

Maverick spend — purchases outside agreed suppliers and terms — isn't tracked, so nobody knows its size.

Four areas of ownership, not a vague advisory retainer

Category Strategy & Consolidation

Builds the category strategy across your largest spend areas, and makes the consolidation and supplier-rationalisation calls that follow it.

Agile Sourcing, Delivered

Where a sprint-based sourcing process fits, the seat-holder scopes it and our delivery bench runs it — the same discipline behind the case studies above.

Contract & Vendor Risk Governance

Independent oversight of contract terms, renewal timing and supplier concentration risk — the exposure most businesses only notice when it's already a problem.

Third-Party & AI-Vendor Commercial Review

Commercial and risk review of AI and software vendor contracts specifically — a category most procurement functions haven't caught up to yet.

Agile sourcing doesn't need inflating to make the case. But it isn't universal — regulated and highly complex categories need a different approach. The seat's job is choosing where it applies as carefully as the sprint itself is run.

The Seat + The Bench

This is the seat where "the bench" is most visible

An agile sourcing sprint is a delivery exercise — a cross-functional room, a compressed timeline, a structured negotiation. The seat-holder scopes which categories are right for it and chairs the commercial decisions. Our delivery bench runs the sprint itself. That's the entire model, made concrete.

Cross-functional team working through analysis together with laptops and notes

Before you take this to the board

Isn't this just a procurement manager with a bigger title?

No — a procurement manager runs transactions. This seat sits at board level, owns strategy and risk, and is accountable for category decisions that affect margin and resilience, not just purchase orders.

Can this work alongside our existing procurement team?

Yes, and usually should. The seat provides senior strategic direction; your existing team often becomes more effective with clear category ownership above them, not less relevant.

Does agile sourcing work for every category?

No, and we'll tell you when it doesn't. Highly regulated or technically complex categories often need a more conventional process — the judgement on which approach fits is part of what the seat is for.

The evidence behind this seat

Agile Sourcing: the real numbers

The full research — case studies, sources, and where the approach doesn't fit.

Read the research

Problem before platform

The same discipline applied to technology programmes — define the problem before choosing the method.

Read the article

See the COO / Transformation seat

Where category strategy connects to the wider operating model.

View the seat

Talk to us about the Procurement seat

A direct conversation about where spend is leaking — not a sales script.